Cite this article as:

Mladenova E. V. The problem of differentiation of the competence of the federal and regional authorities of the state environmental control (supervision). Izv. Saratov Univ., Economics. Management. Law, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 3, pp. 346-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2022-22-3-346-352

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
Law
UDC: 
342.9
Language: 
Russian

The problem of differentiation of the competence of the federal and regional authorities of the state environmental control (supervision)

Introduction. The article is devoted to the problem of delimitation of competence for carrying out control and supervisory activities vertically – between federal and regional executive authorities that implement the function of environmental control (supervision). Theoretical analysis. The delimitation of the powers of federal and regional authorities in the field of state environmental control (supervision) is rather vague. The transfer of a large amount of such powers has led to the complication of the system of state environmental control (supervision). The objects of regional state environmental supervision are determined according to the residual principle without the mandatory fixing their list. At the same time, the legislation does not provide for the possibility of transferring the powers of regional executive authorities in the field of environmental protection to federal authorities. Empirical analysis. In practice, there is often duplication of control and supervision powers in the environmental sphere between federal executive authorities and executive authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, as well as local governments, which negatively affects their performance. In the constituent entities of the Russian Federation there are no specialized bodies exercising the implementation of the powers transferred by the Russian Federation. Results. It is concluded that there is no effective interaction between environmental control (supervision) bodies at all levels of government due to insufficient regulation of this issue in the legislation. In order to eliminate legal conflicts, simplify the interaction between subjects, the article substantiates the necessity of adoption of the Federal Law “On Environmental Control (Supervision)”; development and adoption of administrative regulations for the interaction of federal and regional environmental control (supervision) bodies; conclusion of agreements on the “reverse delegation” of powers from the executive authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation to the federal bodies of state environmental control (supervision).

Author: 
Mladenova
Elizaveta
Vyacheslavovna
Company: 
Stolypin Volga Region Institute of Administration of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
23/25 Sobornaya St., Saratov 410031, Russia
E-mail: 
fairy_119@mail.ru
Key words: 
competence
public administration
environmental control (supervision)
transfer of powers
federal environmental control (supervision) authorities
regional environmental control (supervision) authorities
environmental protection
control and supervision activities
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2022-22-3-346-352
References: 
  1. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Administrativnoye pravo i protsess. Polnyy kurs [Administrative Law and Process. Full Course]. Moscow, Izd-vo Tikhomirov M. Yu., 2001. 652 p. (in Russian).
  2. The Constitution of the Russian Federation (adopted by the popular vote of 12.12.1993) (amended by Federal Constitutional Law 6-FKZ of 30.12.2008, Federal Constitutional Law 7-FKZ of 30.12.2008, Federal Constitutional Law 2-FKZ of 05.02.2014, Federal Constitutional Law 11-FKZ of 21.07.2014, Federal Constitutional Law 1-FKZ of 14.03.2020). Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2014, no. 31, art. 4398; 2020, no. 11, art. 1416 (in Russian).
  3. Negodaeva E. G. Federal and regional environmental supervision on the example of the Rostov region: Questions of theory and practice. Yurist-Pravoved, 2021, no. 2 (97), pp. 21–25 (in Russian).
  4. On Environmental Protection. Federal Law 7-FZ of 10.01.2002 (an edition of 26.03.2022). Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2002, no. 2, art. 133; 2022, no. 13, art. 1960 (in Russian).
  5. On federal state environmental control (supervision). Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation no. 1096 of 30.06.2021 (an edition of 26.02.2022). Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2021, no. 28 (pt. 1), art. 5526; 2022, no. 10, art. 1497 (in Russian).
  6. Sokolov A. Yu., Lakaev O. A. Regional state control (supervision) in the context of the legal policy of the Russian Federation. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn’, 2020, no. 4, pp. 9–19 (in Russian).
  7. Khludeneva N. I. (ed.) Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k Federal’nomu zakonu ot 10 yanvarya 2002 g. № 7-FZ «Ob okhrane okruzhayushchey sredy» [Commentaries on Russian Federal Law 7-FZ “On Environmental Protection” of January 10, 2002]. Moscow, Law Firm Kontrakt LLC, 2018. 528 p. (in Russian).
  8. Forest Code of the Russian Federation 200-FZ of 4.12.2006 (an edition of 30.12.2021). Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2006, no. 50, art. 5278; 2022, no. 1 (pt. I), art. 14 (in Russian).
  9. Water Code of the Russian Federation 74-FZ of 3.06.2006 (an edition of 1.05.2022). Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2006, no. 23, art. 2381; 2022, no. 18, art. 3008 (in Russian).
  10. On the Protection of Atmospheric Air. Federal Law 96- FZ of 4.05.1999 (an edition of 11.06.2021). Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 1999, no. 18, art. 2222; 2021, no. 24 (pt. I), art. 4188.8 (in Russian).
  11. Ganyukhina O. Yu. Legal Regulation of Environmental Control in the Russian Federation. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Saratov, 2007. 29 p. (in Russian).
  12. On the General Principles of Organization of Legislative (Representative) and Executive Bodies of State Power of the Subjects of the Russian Federation. Federal Law 184-FZ of 6.10.1999 (an edition of 21.12.2021). Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 1999, no. 42, art. 5005; 2021, no. 52 (pt. I), art. 8973 (in Russian).
  13. Navasardova E. S. On delegated powers in the fi eld of environmental protection and nature management. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess [Administrative Law and Process], 2007, no. 5, pp. 40–43 (in Russian).
  14. Issues of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Saratov Region. Decree of the Government of the Saratov Region no. 537-P of 8.10.2013 (an edition of 13.05.2022). Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Saratovskoy oblasti [Collection of Laws of the Saratov region], 2013, no. 41 (in Russian).
  15. On state control (supervision) and municipal control in the Russian Federation. Federal Law 248-FZ of 31.07.2020 (an edition of 06.12.2021). Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2020, no. 31 (pt. I), art. 5007; 2021, no. 50 (pt. III), art. 8415 (in Russian).
  16. Ministerstvo ekonomicheskogo razvitiya rassmotrit reformu po ob#edineniyu vsekh vidov ekologicheskogo nadzora v edinyi (The Ministry of Economic Development will consider a reform to consolidate all types of environmental supervision into a single one). Available at: https://www.atomic-energy.ru/news/2021/02/04/111170 (accessed 15 January 2022) (in Russian).
  17. Butylina E. V. Land Supervision and Control. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2016. 27 p. (in Russian).
Full Text (PDF): 
PDF icon ekonomika_2022_3_346-352.pdf
Status: 
одобрена к публикации
Journal issue: 
Izv. Sarat. Univ. Economics. Management. Law, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 3