Cite this article as:
Privalov S. A. Essence of Freedom of Mass Information in the Constitutional Law of Russia and Germany. Izv. Saratov Univ., Economics. Management. Law, 2020, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. 89-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2020-20-1-89-96
Essence of Freedom of Mass Information in the Constitutional Law of Russia and Germany
Introduction. Freedom of the media is one of the indicators of the level of development of democracy in a particular state, including the Russian Federation. In order to achieve a real democratic regime in modern Russia, the need for creation of an effective framework for the implementation of constitutional freedom of the media arises. However, despite the high importance of the unhindered circulation of information in society, the concept of media freedom is currently poorly developed in Russian legal science, in contrast to German legal thought. Theoretical analysis. The definition of the essence of freedom of the media today is comprehensive. Freedom in question is at the crossroads of constitutional law, philosophy, political science and sociology. A significant problem is the definition of the nature of freedom of the media as a special case of constitutional freedom. Nevertheless, the establishment of the concept of this freedom seems necessary in order to ensure the normal development of democratic institutions in society and the degree of possible influence of public and private institutions on them. Empirical analysis. The most significant problems in determining the essence of freedom of the media in Russia and Germany are the determination of its relationship with other constitutional freedoms, which are stipulated in the legislation of the countries in question. The most important thing is to determine the relationship between constitutional freedom of the media with freedom of the press and freedom of information in the constitutional legislation of the Russian Federation and the Federal Republic of Germany. Results. On the basis of Russian and German legislation, as well as the views of prominent scientists, it is proposed that the mass media should be understood as individual’s ability, unconditioned by anyone and anything, to be a subject of mass processes of information circulation. In addition, it substantiates the need to separate the concepts of freedom of the media from its closely related freedom of the press and freedom of information.
- Chernykh A. I. Sotsiologiia massovykh kommunikatsiy [Sociology of Mass Communications]. Moscow, Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2008. 452 p. (in Russian).
- Starikov A. G. Mass-media sovremennoi Rossii [Mass media of modern Russia]. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 2013. 250 p. (in Russian).
- Chernykh A. I. Media i demokratiya [Media and democracy]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Universitetskaia kniga Publ., 2011. 272 p. (in Russian).
- Lipchanskaya M. A., Rubanova M. E. The specifics of the implementation of freedom of speech as a form of constitutional constructive protest. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi iuridicheskoi akademii [Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin], 2017, no. 6 (119), pp. 101–109 (in Russian).
- Hobbes T. Leviafan [Leviathan]. Moscow, RIPOL classic Publ., 2017. 608 p. (in Russian).
- Spinoza B. Sochineniya [Works: in 2 vols. Vol. 1. 2nd ed.]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2006. 489 p. (in Russian).
- Berlin I. Filosofi ya svobody. Evropa [Philosophy of freedom. Europe]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2001. 448 p. (in Russian).
- Ebzeev B. S. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossii [Constitutional law of Russia]. Moscow, Prospect Publ., 2019. 768 p. (in Russian).
- Convention for the Protection of the Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Man and Citizen. Adopted in Rome on 04/04/1950: Ratified by the Russian Federation by Federal Law no. 54-FZ of 03.30.1998: as amended by Protocol N 11 of 11.05.1994. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2001, no. 2, art. 163 (in Russian).
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 10, 1948. Rossiiskaia gazeta [Russian newspaper], 1995, no. 67 (in Russian).
- The Constitution of the Russian Federation (adopted by the popular vote of 12.12.1993) (amended of 30.12.2008 no. 6-FKZ, of 30.12.2008 no. 7-FKZ, of 05.02.2014 no. 2-FKZ, of 21.07.2014 no. 11-FKZ). Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2014, no. 31, art. 4398 (in Russian).
- Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany of May 23, 1949 (BGBl. P. 1), last amended by Article 1 of the Law of 13 July 2017 (BGBl. I p. 2347). Available at: https://www.bundestag.de/parlament/aufgaben/rechtsgrundlagen/grundgesetz... (accessed 17 September 2019) (in German).
- On the media. Law of 27.12.1991 no. 2124-1 (an edition of 06.06.2019). Rossiiskaia gazeta [Russian newspaper], 1992, no. 32; Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2018, no. 53 (pt. I), art. 8460 (in Russian).
- Saxon Law on the Press of 3 April 1992 (SächsGVBl. P. 125), which was last amended by Article 13 of the Act of 11 May 2019 (SächsGVBl., P. 358). Available at: https://www.revosax.sachsen.de/vorschrift/4197-SaechsPresseG (accessed 17 September 2019) (in German).
- Sheverdyaev S. N. The right to information: on the issue of constitutional legal essence. Pravo i politika [Law and Politics], 2001, no. 10. pp. 91–100 (in Russian).
- Thirteenth interim report of the Enquete Commission “Internet and digital society”: German Bundestag, 2013. 164 p. Available at: https://dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21.web/bt (accessed 20 September 2019) (in German).
- Koreng A. Censorship on the Internet. The constitutional protection of digital mass communication. Baden-Baden, 2010. 226 p. (in German).
- Federal Constitutional Court – Delivered on 5 August 1966 – In the name of the people. Spiegel ONLINE. 2019. Available at: http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-46414150.html (accessed 22 September 2019) (in German).