Cite this article as:

Yurin V. M. Problems of Insituting Criminal Cases of Economic Character. Izv. Saratov Univ., Economics. Management. Law, 2013, vol. 13, iss. 4, pp. 712-718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2013-13-4-2-712-718


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
UDC: 
343.98.067
Language: 
Russian

Problems of Insituting Criminal Cases of Economic Character

The effectiveness  of the fight against economic crimes  depends  on many  factors,  primarily on the timeliness  of detection of elements  of a crime and instituting criminal case. In  this article,  we will  focus  on problem situations that arise from instituting criminal cases  of economic crimes  committed under the guise of transaction.  The analysis of problem situations in the investigation of cause  for  instituting  criminal  cases  showed  that  there doesn’t always  take  into account that the cause has a dual nature: on the one hand - this is the source  which the competent authorities receive information about a crime from and on the other hand - this is the legal fact  which connects  the beginning of the procedural activity  of  the inquiry,  the investigator, the prosecutor on detection of crimes.  The analysis of problem situations in the investigation of grounds for instituting cases  allows  to  conclude  that  in  the  case  where the crime was committed under the guise of transactions, intent is subject to compulsory  investigation during the verifying information about the crime.  Conclusions.  The  result  of  this  research  is  the  conclusion  that  the  presence  of  civil  relations  can  not  be  a  basis  for refusing to accept the application or refusal to initiate criminal case. To  make  the correct and informed  decision about initiation a criminal case  or to refuse  to initiate it is necessary  to examine in  some cases  the subjective aspect  of the behavior of the culprit.

References: 
  1. Ivanova  V. G. Predvaritel’naja proverka informacii o prestuplenijah, sovershaemyh medicinskimi rabotnikami v processe professional’noj dejatel’nosti [Preliminary verifi cation of information about crimes committed by health care providers in the course of professional activity].  Vestnik kriminalistiki.  Otv. red.  A. G. Filippov [Bulletin of criminalistics. Ed. A. G. Filippov. Iss. 4 (36). Moscow, 2010, pp. 95–102.
  2. Yurin  V. Zajavlenie ob jekonomicheskom prestuplenii soglasovanija ne trebuet [Statement of economic crime agreement does not require].  Rossijskaja justicija  [Russian justice], 2001, no. 7, pp. 49–50.
  3. Kornukov  V. M., Lazarev  V.  A., Holodenko  V. D. Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnogo dela v sisteme ugolovnoprocessual’noj dejatel’nosti  [Instituting criminal cases in the criminal procedure]. Saratov, 2002. 156 p.
  4. Polenina S.  V.  Vzaimodejstvie sistemy prava i sistemy zakonodatel’stva v sovremennoj Rossii [Interaction between the law and the system of law in modern Russia].  Gosudarstvo i pravo  [The state and the law], 1999, no. 9, pp. 8–14.
  5. Jani P. S. Problemy ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti za jekonomicheskie prestuplenija [Problems of criminal responsibility for economic crimes].  Zakonnost’ [Legality], 2001, no. 1, pp. 3–5.
  6. Zavidov B. D., Gusev O. B. K jekstravagantnomu voprosu o pererastanii grazhdanskoj otvetstvennosti v ugolovnuju [By extravagant issue of the growing civil liability in the criminal].  Jurist,  2000, no. 5, pp. 46–52.
  7. Lucenko O. A.  Rassledovanie hishhenij v sfere bankovskoj dejatel’nosti  [The investigation of thefts in the area of banking ]. Rostov on Don, 1998. 140 p.
  8. Stepanov V. V.  Predvaritel’naja proverka pervichnyh materialov o prestuplenijah  [Preliminary testing of the primary materials on crime]. Saratov, 1972. 143 p.
  9. Grigor’ev  V.  N.  Obnaruzhenie priznakov prestuplenija organami vnutrennih del  [The detection signs of a crime by the police].  Tashkent, 1986. 84 p.
  10. Kurinov  B. A.  Nauchnye osnovy kvalifi kacii  prestuplenij [Scientifi c basis of qualifying crimes]. Moscow, 1984. 181 p.
  11. Stepanov  V.  V.  V.  A. Poznanskij o stadii vozbuzhdenija ugolovnogo dela [V.  A. Poznan  About the stages of instituting a criminal case ].  Vestnik SGAP  [Bulletin of the Saratov State  Academy of Law], 2001, no. 3, pp. 9–14.
  12. Savickij  V.  M.  Ocherk teorii prokurorskogo nadzora [Outline of the  Theory of Public Prosecutions]. Moscow, 1975. 382 p.
  13. Cvetkov S. I.  Organizacija registracii i rassmotrenija organami vnutrennih del zajavlenij i soobshhenij o prestuplenijah  [Organization registration and review by the internal affairs of statements and reports of crimes]. Moscow, 1982. 99 p.
  14. Vlasova N.  A.  Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnogo dela: teoreticheskie i pravovye problemy [Criminal case: theoretical and legal issues ].  Zhurnal rossijskogo prava [Journal of Russian law], 2000, no. 11, pp. 26–27.
  15. Postanovlenie Plenuma  Verhovnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii ot 18 nojabrja 2004 g.  №  23 «O sudebnoj praktike po delam o nezakonnom predprinimatel’stve i legalizacii (otmyvanii) denezhnyh sredstv ili inogo imushhestva, priobretennyh prestupnym putem» [Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of November 18, 2004  №  23 «On judicial practice in cases of illegal business and the legalization ( laundering ) of money or other property acquired by criminal means»].  Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 2004, December 7.
  16. Koni A.  F.  Izbrannye proizvedenija:  v 2 tomach. T. 2:  Vospominanija [Selected works: in 2 vol. Vol. 2:  A  Memoir]. Moscow, 1959. 536 p.
  17. Galanova L.  V.  Sledstvennye situacii i takticheskie operacii pri rassledovanii prestuplenij, svjazannyh s vymogatel’stvom.  Dis. kand. jurid. nauk [Investigating the situation and tactical operations during the investigation of crimes of extortion. Cand. law sci. diss.]. Saratov, 2000. 172 p.
Status: 
не проверена