Русский
EnglishCite this article as:
Evseeva M. V. Projects and Programs Portfolio Management: Modern Requirements. Izv. Saratov Univ., Economics. Management. Law, 2019, vol. 19, iss. 2, pp. 165-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2019-19-2-165-171
Projects and Programs Portfolio Management: Modern Requirements
Introduction. Modern operating conditions of companies are determined by a number of global trends, such as changes in the format of doing business under the influence of digitalization and network economy, increasing the degree of environmental uncertainty due to the reduction of technological cycles and changes in the structure of transaction costs. This entails a change in the requirements for management technologies – they must be distinguished by flexibility, adaptability, and resource efficiency. Theoretical analysis. The methodological basis of the study was a set of theories concerning innovation management, portfolio and project management. The typology of project portfolios is represented by eleven types of portfolios. Project portfolio management models are classified by single and multi-criteria. The limitations of the well-known models of portfolio management application due to their low relevance to modern realities are noted. Empirical analysis. The main analysis method was a theoretical analysis of modern requirements for the functionality of the organization’s project management system. Results. It was revealed that the main requirements are to take into account the network effects of the mutual influence of projects in the portfolio, embed flexible technologies in the portfolio management process, and improve mechanisms for managing stakeholder and risks, as opportunities and threats. The obtained results can be used in practical work on projects and programs portfolios managing in any type of organizations.
1. A Guide to The Project Management Body of Knowledge. URL: http://fbs.dinus.edu/repository/docs/ajar/PMBOKGuide_5th_Ed.pdf (дата обращения: 12.01.2019).
2. Аньшин В. М., Демкин И. В., Никонов И. М., Царьков И. Н. Модели управления портфелем проектов в условиях неопределенности. М. : ИЦ МАТИ, 2007. 117 c.
3. Кендалл Д. И., Роллинз С. К. Современные методы управления портфелями проектов и офис управления проектами : Максимизация ROI : пер. с анг. М. : ПМСОФТ, 2004. 338 с.
4. Матвеев А. А., Новиков Д. А., Цветков А. В. Модели и методы управления портфелями проектов. М. : ПМСОФТ, 2005. 206 с.
5. Cooper R. G. Perspective : The Stage-Gate Idea to Launch Process – Update, What’s new and NexGen Systems. URL: https://www.stage-gate.net/downloads/wp/wp_30.pdf (дата обращения: 12.01.2019).
6. Badri M., Devis D. A Comprehensive 0-1 Goal Programming Model for Project Selection // International Journal of Project Management. 2001. № 19. P. 487–499.
7. Dickinson M., Thornton A., Graves S. Technology Portfolio Management : Optimizing Interdependent Projects Over Multiple Time Periods // IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2001. № 4 (48). P. 245–261.
8. Бурков В. Н., Джавахадзе Г. С. Экономико-математические модели управления развитием отраслевого производства. М. : ИПУ РАН, 1997. 64 с.
9. Орехова С. В., Леготин Ф. Я. Механизмы инвестирования в ресурсы предприятия : обоснование выбора и российская специфика // Изв. УрГЭУ. 2016. № 1 (63). С. 80–89.
10. Репешко Н. А. Принципы формирования портфеля инновационных проектов организации // Вестн. Брянск. госун-та. 2013. № 3. С. 232–237.
11. Chesbrough H. Open Innovation. The New Imperative for Creating and Profi ting from Technology. Brighton (MA) : Harvard Business Press, 2003. 227 р.
12. Ткаченко И. Н., Сивокоз К. К. Использование гибких технологий Agile и Scrum для управления стейкхолдерами проектов // Управленец. 2017. № 4 (68). С. 85–95.
13. Vedsmand Т., Kielgast S., Cooper R. G. Integrating Agile with StageGate – How New Agile-Scrum Methods Lead to Faster and Better Innovation. URL: https://www.innovationmanagement.se/2016/08/09/integrating-agilewithstag... (дата обращения: 12.01.2019).
14. Корнеев Д. В. Креативный подход к рискам как фактору предпринимательской активности интегрированных структур // Изв. УрГЭУ. 2016. № 4 (66). С. 126–136.
