Law

Introduction. The electoral legislation of the Russian state at various stages of its development enshrines the open or secret ballot in elections to bodies of state authority and local self-government. Purpose. The main purpose is to analyze the development of the electoral legislation of the secret ballot in pre-revolutionary Russia and throughout the Soviet period. Results. Legal consolidation of the principle of the secret ballot took place in pre-revolutionary Russia. During the first decade of the Soviet power voting was conducted openly, even in the case of an alternate consolidation of the secret ballot in the legal acts which regulated the conduct of elections to the councils. Further development of the secret ballot in the Soviet Russia is characterized by progressive democratic legislation and politicized practice of its implementation. Implementation of the secret ballot in the election practice of the USSR began in the last years of perestroika. Conclusion. The author suggests a periodization of the main stages of the development of electoral legislation on secret ballot in pre-revolutionary Russia and throughout the Soviet period.

Introduction. In modern conditions, one of the important areas of national development is acknowledged state cultural policy, including with regard to cultural heritage, designed to ensure priority of cultural and human development as the foundation of economic prosperity, national sovereignty and civilizational identity of the Russian Federation. Theoretical analysis. prerequisites for the formation of the state of Russia’s policy in relation to cultural heritage are the provisions of the Constitution, the generally recognized principles and international acts in the cultural sphere as well as the objectives of the Russian state to preserve the unity and integrity of the state, traditional values and national identity. State objectives in the field of cultural heritage are proposed to divide into two groups: the tasks of the intangible mental order and tasks aimed at preserving the cultural heritage, that is, the material nature of the problem. Empirical analysis. Existence of the constitutional obligation determines the objective need for the production of a clear and effective system of legal liability for failure or improper performance of duties within the public policy with respect to the cultural heritage. It is necessary to specify what is meant by «passive» implementation of the constitutional responsibilities of each one to preserve cultural heritage.

Introduction. Globalization and regionalizations of social and economic communications caused contradictory changes in legal system of the Russian Federation. It is receive an ambiguous assessment in legal science and practice. So there is an introduction of not traditional categories for jurisprudence in legal practice, one of which is non jurisdictional process. Theoretical analysis. The formation of the concept of the normative bases of non jurisdictional process will promote detection of dependences between rules of legislation and its practice. The materialization of non jurisdictional process can be carried out in borders of realization of the right. It is possible because of indirect legal fixing in the legislation. Therefore legitimate interests of owners are limits of legalization of non jurisdictional process. Non jurisdictional forms of ensuring the rights and legitimate interests are applied in the international and state public and private law. Therefore, the object of analysis is different legal acts. Conclusion. This analysis allows to claim that the legislation of Russian Federation contains the provisions allowing and providing legalization of non jurisdictional process in legal system of the Russian Federation. It plays a role of the normative bases of introduction of non jurisdictional process legal practice. Legal rules are allow to consider the non jurisdictional process as one of components of the mechanism of ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of the person. In this sense the problem of not jurisdictional process is interdisciplinary.

Introduction. Statistical managing of processes and making the decisions based on facts are the basic requirements of the international standards of ISO 9000 quality system, which can be made using the introduction of statistical methods. Implementation of corrective actions to improve the quality of products is an essential component of the statistical management, in any other case, the application of statistical methods is less effective. Methods. The nessesity for a methodology was caused by practical necessity. Since the analysis of the practice and production of fingerprints’ trasological and dactiloscopical examination shows that some of the techniques and methods used in the identification of objects in their fingerprints, do not correspond to modern requirements and need to be improved. A special technique was developed. The techniqu of topographic compatibility is based on the priority of actions to transform the tracks and prints in the standard form, to calculate the ratio of the average distance between the display of corresponding pores to the average distance between the pores of trace or print. Methodology IDEF0 (methodology integral description for functional simulation) was chosen to describe this process. Nowadays the most wide-spread methodologies are: UML, ARIS, IDEF0, IDEF3, flowcharts, DFD. Results. The comparison of several pairs of fingerprints left by the same area of the finger has shown that the ratio of the average distance between the display corresponding pores to the average distance between the pores footprint or imprint, existing on a papillary line, turned out to be within 0.08  0.2, so we can say, that in this case the numerical value is not more than 0.2 can be concluded about the identity.