Русский
EnglishCite this article as:
Лисюткин А. Б. The Nature of Non Jurisdictional Process: Logiko-gnoseological Aspect. Izv. Saratov Univ., Economics. Management. Law, 2015, vol. 15, iss. 2, pp. 211-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2015-15-2-211-220
The Nature of Non Jurisdictional Process: Logiko-gnoseological Aspect
Introduction. The modern legal sphere is characterized by the destruction of binary structure based on the balance of two systems of social and economical development. This had in impact on the increasing role and importance of the non-jurisdictional process based on rationalism and functional structuralism. Theoretical analysis. The article deals with the relations between form of action, procedure, and legal process to profoundly understand the nature of the non-jurisdictional process. As a result we come to a conclusion that legal relations are a universal form of action, the structural elements of which are process and procedure. Russian legislation is analyzed on the subject of normative base of the non-jurisdictional process. One of the conclusions made in the article is that non-jurisdictional process consists of action of bearers of rights and duties to provide their legitimate interest by the consequent change of the stages or conditions, which reflect the relations of the will and interest. The article touches upon the specific features of the non-jurisdictional process: the absence of dispute about rights; the presence of not less than two concerned parties; legal order as a form of action of non-jurisdictional process; the freedom of will to provide legitimate interest; conscious and volitional nature of the non-jurisdictional process. In the article the types and subtypes of the non-jurisdictional process are described. Conclusion. The non-jurisdictional process is a specific behavioral model of the subject to protect their legitimate interests. The object of non-jurisdictional process is interest of parties or third parties, that encumbered with obligations. The non-jurisdictional doesn’t affect with interests of third parties.
1. Juridicheskaja processual’naja forma: teorija i praktika [Legal procedural form: the theory and practice. Ed. by P. E. Nedbajlo, V. M, Gorshenev]. Moscow, 1976. 279 p.
2. Istorija srednih vekov [History of the Middle Ages. Ed. by N. F. Kolesnickiy]. Moscow, 1964. 704 p.
3. Kelzen G. Chistoe uchenie o prave, spravedlivosti i estestvennoe pravo [The blank doctrine about the right, justice and the natural right. Translation from Ger- man, English, French, orig. and introductory article
M. V. Antonov]. St. Petersburg, 2015. 704 p.
4. O Sudebnoj sisteme Rossijskoj Federacii: feder. kon- stitut. zakon ot 31 janvarja 1996 g. № 1-FKZ (red. ot 05.02.2014): prinjat Gosudarstvennoj Dumoj Fe- deral’nogo Sobranija Rossijskoj Federacii 23 okt. 1996 g.: odobr. Sovetom Federacii Federal’nogo Sobra- nija Rossijskoj Federacii 26 dekabrja 1996 g. [About judicial system of Russian Federation. Federal Consti- tutional law of January 31, 1996 № 1-FKZ]. Rossijskaja gazeta [Russian newspaper], 1997, 6 January.
5. Jakovenko O. V. Pravovaja procedura [Process of law.
Сand. jur. sci. thesis diss.]. Saratov, 1999. 22 p.
6. Kommentarij k Ugolovno-processual’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii [The comment to the Code of criminal procedure of the Russian Federation. Ed.
V. M. Lebedev]. Moscow, 2014. 1077 p.
7. Sheptulin A. P. Kategorii dialektiki [Categories of dia- lectics.]. Moscow, 1971. 279 p.
8. Teorija juridicheskogo processa [The theory of legal process. Ed. by V. M. Gorshenev]. Harkov, 1985. 192 p.
9. Bajtin M. I., Jakovenko O. V. Teoreticheskie voprosy pravovoj procedury [Theoretical questions of process of law]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2000, no. 8, pp. 93–102.
10. Pavlushina A. A. Teorija juridicheskogo processa: itogi, problemy, perspektivy razvitija [Theory of legal process: results, problems, development]. Samara, 2005. 480 p.
11. Konstitucija Rossijskoj Federacii i gosudarstvennaja simvolika Rossijskoj Federacii [Constitution of the Russian Federation and state symbolics of the Russian Federation. Ed. T. Degtayreva]. Moscow, 2014. 64 p.
12. Grazhdanskij kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii (Chast’ per- vaja) ot 30 nojabrja 1994 g. № 51-FZ (red. ot 06.04.2015) [Civil code of the Russian Federation of November 30, 1994 № 51-FZ (ed. of 06.04.2015)]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation]. 1994, no. 32, art. 3301.
13. Rushajlo V. B. Administrativno-pravovye rezhimy [Ad- ministrative legal regimes]. Moscow, 2000. 264 p.
14. Kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ob administrativnyh pra- vonarushenijah ot 30 dekabrja 2001 g. № 195-FZ (red. ot 06.04.2015) [The code about administrative offences of the Russian Federation of December 30, 2001 № 195- FZ]. Rossijskaja gazeta [Russian newspaper], 2001, 31 December.
15. Bergamann V., Gutbrod M. Vvedenie k ponimaniju Grazhdanskogo processual’nogo ulozhenija [Introduction to understanding of the Civil procedural code]. Grazh- danskoe processual’noe ulozhenie Germanii. Vvodnyj zakon k Grazhdanskomu processual’nomu ulozheniju [Civil procedural code of Germany. The introduction law to the Civil procedural code. Translation from German]. Moscow, 2006. 472 p.
