национальная безопасность

Legal State and State Compulsion

The article analyzes the problems of state compulsion in a legal state as the primary method of control. The author, using the historical method, demonstrates the practical application of compulsion in the Russian state. Indicated that, in the modern state compulsory measures can be used in several guises. In particular, as a means of overcoming social conflict and the fight against terrorism. There are several arguments justifying the need for compulsion in the modern legal state.

Contemporary Problems of Economic Security of Russian Regions

 In the conditions of reforming of Russian economy when the change of governing system takes at times rather difficult forms, a special attention should be drawn to the problem of economic security of Russian regions. The article studies the interrelations of the notions «economic security», «economic security of the regions» and «regional crisis situation». Theoretical analysis. The article contains the comparative analysis of crisis situations valuation methods applied at the federal and regional levels. There have been revealed zones of threats to the economic security in resources of strategic focus. The crisis condition of economy and social sphere of regions is formed under the influence of specific manifestations of the following phenomena and processes, able to cause the threats to the national (first economic) security of Russia. The author suggests at the studying of impact character of regional factors of destabilization on the national and economic security of the country, to assess the structural changes in the regional economy not only from the viewpoint of the current market condition but taking into account long-term economic advantages of a certain territory in the whole system of territorial division of labor. Discussion of results. Market transformations without state interference and support of regions of different types, without coordination and regulation in the state interests will lead to the strengthening of disintegrated tendencies, diminish the security of the state and restrict the rights of our citizens. 

New Principles of Federalism: Guarantee of Territorial Integrity and Sovereignty of the Russian Federation

Introduction. The article is devoted to the analysis of constitutional and legal regulation of the issues of Russian federalism, namely the preservation of territorial integrity and sovereignty of the Russian Federation. Theoretical analysis. The author considers the main results of developments in the Russian Federation and in foreign states in the sphere of ensuring national sovereignty. The author aso looks at the results of the referendum on independence in individual countries, attempts of introduction of new standards of international law directly limiting the sovereignty of states, the instability of the situation in the socio-political spheres of constituent entities of the Russian Federation, Association of regions, Federal districts. The author formulates the thesis that the problem of preservation of territorial integrity, the sovereignty of our country is particularly relevant and requires elaboration of the mechanism for its preservation and maintenance. Since the scope of legal regulation of this issue in the current legislation is insufficient, the author also proposes the ways of improving the Constitution of the Russian Federation, other normative legal acts in terms of securing new principles of federalism and guarantees of their implementation. Results. The author notes that the creation of a mechanism, that would ensure the preservation of the territorial integrity of Russia and would reliably guarantee the unity of our state, is necessary to preserve the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the state. To this end, the author proposes to include in the Constitution of the Russian Federation the principles of federalism, which could ensure the preservation of the territorial integrity of the state, would become guarantees of state sovereignty in crisis situations. These principles include the following: 1. Ban on holding referendums with separatist issues. 2. The possibility of direct presidential rule. 3. Prohibition of secession including unilaterally. 4. The principle of the supremacy of national legislation. It is also necessary to provide a mechanism to defend their rights in the international arena, to exclude the mandatory application of the decisions of international organizations that threaten state sovereignty.

РОЛЬ ПРЕЗИДЕНТА ПО ОХРАНЕ СУВЕРЕНИТЕТА, НЕЗАВИСИМОСТИ И ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЙ ЦЕЛОСТНОСТИ В ЗАРУБЕЖНЫХ СТРАНАХ

Введение. Обеспечение суверенитета, независимости и го- сударственной целостности является одним из направлений деятельности любого государства, поскольку непосредственно связано с его существованием и назначением. Реализация дан- ного направления осуществляется посредством слаженной рабо- ты всех органов государственной власти, возглавляемой главой государства. В странах с республиканской формой правления главой государства признается президент. Функции и объем полномочий президента в сфере охраны суверенитета, независи- мости и государственной целостности зависят от разновидности республиканской формы правления. Цель. Основная цель рабо- ты состоит в анализе роли и полномочий президента по охране суверенитета, независимости и государственной целостности в зависимости от формы правления. Результаты. Подтверждает- ся, что в зависимости от формы правления полномочия прези- дента по охране суверенитета, независимости и государственной целостности имеют существенные различия, но при этом присут- ствуют общие для всех государств полномочия. Заключение. Полномочия президента по охране суверенитета, независимости и государственной целостности зависят от места президента в системе органов государственной власти. В республиках с президентской или смешанной формами правления президент обладает значительным объемом полномочий в сфере охраны суверенитета, независимости и государственной целостности. В парламентской республике полномочия президента фактически носят формальный и репрезентативный характер, а реальное управление государством и обеспечение его суверенитета, не- зависимости и государственной целостности находится в руках исполнительной власти.