Президент РФ

Powers of the President of the Russian Federation on Rewarding by the State Awards of the Russian Federation

The article revealed the history of the institute awards in Russia, analyzed the latest theoretical and practical issues of national awards. Disclosed the original concept of state awards, as well as the democratic value of this institution in the Russian reality. The author covers the basics of the legal regulation of the President of the Russian Federation for State awards. 

Questions of Constitutionally-Legal Status of Auxiliary Bodies at President of Russian Federation

Introduction. The present article is concerned with the status of the subsidiary bodies, which assist the presidential power realization in the field of the person legal status specification, that is the presidential powers, enshrined in Article 89 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation (The President of the Russian Federation shall: solve the issues of citizenship of the Russian Federation and of granting political asylum; decorate with state awards of the Russian Federation, award honourary titles of the Russian Federation, higher military and higher special ranks; decide on pardoning). Results. The author studied the regulatory matters of the Presidential Administration, the Presidential commission and councils, which make up the system of the subsidiary bodies under the head of state. Conclution. Analysis of the practice of their activities allowed us to formulate the legislative development proposal through the adoption of the Federal Constitutional Law «On the President of the Russian Federation», distinguishing the chapter «The subsidiary bodies under the President of the Russian Federation», which will fix their status, formation and operation.

The place of the President of the Russian Federation in the constitutional system of public authority (In the light of the 2020 constitutional reform)

Introduction. The constitutional and legal characteristic of the status of any body begins with identifi cation of its place in the system of power. It is this element that is permanently (continuously, incessantly) in the focus of the study of presidential power. Theoretical analysis. It is noted that the next constitutional reform of the Russian statehood is determined by a certain stage in the transformation of the presidential power, namely its modernization, constitutionalization and, ultimately, institutionalization. Empirical analysis. The practice of constitutional reform, conditioned by the transformation of the presidential power, is analyzed, and its new periodization is proposed on this basis. It has been proved that the content of the 2020 constitutional amendment is due to the constitutionalization of presidential powers in the sphere of public authority. At the current stage of the institutionalization of the presidential power, a proposal has been formulated to improve its legal regulation as a leading entity that ensures the unity of the system of public authorities. Results. The author concludes that the modern legal regime of public power is determined by the central place of the President of the Russian Federation in its system, which requires further constitutional and value regulation.

The Issue of the Legitimacy of Modern Constitutional Reform

Introduction. The reform of the Basic Law throughout the modern history of Russia has been determined by the political expediency of transforming the presidential power. Until the mid-2000s the constitutional inviolability supported by the authorities was aimed at preserving its political stability. Theoretical analysis. The Russian Federation has entered a new stage of constitutional development, due to the need for constitutionalization – giving a legitimate character to the prevailing presidential power. Any constitutional reform requires a theoretical understanding of its legitimacy, expediency, legality. Empirical analysis. The main factor in modern constitutional reform is the need for constitutionalization of presidential power. Results. The introduction of additional procedures for the adoption of an amendment to the Constitution testifies to the political will of the President of the Russian Federation to enlist the support of active participants in constitutional processes, thereby putting the ongoing constitutional reform in a legitimate and legal form.

Modern Constitutional-Legal Regulation of the Organization and Activity of Presidential Plenipotentiary Envoy to Russia

Introduction. RF President occupies a leading place in the system of Russian power. RF Constitution in art. 80 determines the RF status of the President as head of state, whose responsibilities include security, coordination and control of the most important areas of public administration: the Constitution, the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, the sovereignty of the Russian Federation, its independence and state integrity, coordinated functioning and interaction public authorities. The fundamental tools in the work of the Head of State spoke of his powers to determine the main directions of domestic and foreign policy in accordance with the Constitution and federal laws, as well as the Russian representative in the country and in international relations. For the implementation of competence, the President shall have broad powers laid down in Chapter 4 and other articles of the Basic Law and constitutional law. Thus, the President is entitled to form its own unit, namely the Administration and its member plenipotentiaries (pp. I), k) art. 83 of the Constitution). Purpose. The main objective of the work is theoretical understanding of institute of plenipotentiaries of the Head of the Russian State and to develop practical recommendations to improve regulation and enforcement. Results. It is stated that the establishment of the institute of plenipotentiaries of the President of the Russian Federation is defined unlimited constitutional right of the President and is aimed at the formation mechanism of the implementation of its broad competence. Conclusion. The status is determined by the Plenipotentiary Representative of the Head of State, different legal diversity, it requires legislative harmonization and improvement of law enforcement.

Governance and the Constitutional Process: Problems of Interaction and Mutual Influence

The form of government as one of the three characteristics of the structure of the state, determined by the method of formation of the public authorities. The classic formula defines a republic as a form of government in which the supreme authorities elected or formed a national representative institution. Depending on the procedure of formation of executive power and the place of the President (Head of State) in the government distinguished presidential, parliamentary and semi-presidential republic, in which the law or in fact the president is always a chief executive or a part of it. At the same time the fundamental principles governing the system of state power and the place of its president, is the principle of separation of powers and independence of authorities (Art. 10 The Constitution of the Russian Federation), as well as the unity of state power (Pt. 3 of Art. 5 The Constitution of the Russian Federation). Methods. The methodological basis of research supports internally interconnected complex methods of knowledge: system-structural, functional, logical, historical. The basic general legal methods are comparative legal and formal-legal, allowing the author to explore the legal basis of the formal and the actual form of government in Russia, comparing the attributes of the Parliamentary, presidential and semi-presidential republic. Results. It is stated that at the present stage of development of the Russian state needs to shift from sverhprezidentskoy to parliamentary form of government with the relevant constitutional changes in law and practice.

The Political and Legal Basis of interaction of Business Ombudsman with Authorities and Other Organizations on Protection of Rights and Legal Interests of Subjects of Entrepreneurial Activity (based on performances at the III International Conference «Mo

Introduction. At the present stage of development of the institution of human rights and individual categories of citizens in the Russian Federation is particularly important legal analysis of the Commissioner’s powers to protect the rights of entrepreneurs on the federal and regional level in the Russian Federation. At the present stage, this institution is developing intensively. Implementation of office business ombudsman directly related to the problems of its interaction with various public authorities to protect the rights of business entities. Methods. Methodological basis of research supports internally interconnected complex methods of cognition: systematic and structural, functional, logical, historical. Basic general legal methods are the comparative legal and legalistic, allowing the author to explore the legal basis for the organization and activities of the institution of the protection of entrepreneurs’ rights in Russia at the federal level and the level of subjects of the Russian Federation (on the example of the Saratov region). Results. It is stated that in the activity authorized are not independent, as evidenced by the order of their appointment and the early dismissal, the formation and operation of the machine, as well as reporting and monitoring of their activities on the part of officials in which they are created. The author comes to the conclusion that 1) improve the legal regulation and practice of implementing powers business ombudsman at the federal and regional levels, 2) bringing the legislation of the Russian Federation in accordance with the common federal requirements.