Russian economy
Import substitution as a factor of Russian economy innovative development |
Introduction. In the modern world, the introduction of innovations is becoming one of the main ways of economic development of both organizations and states. In this regard, the process of switching Russian economy to the innovative way of development acquires special importance. Still in 2011, the Government approved the Strategy for Innovative Development of Russia until 2020: it formulates the goals of the country’s long-term development and indicators that characterize their implementation. Import substitution was identified as one of the key factors contributing to the achievement of these goals. The aim of the work is to study the impact of import substitution on the effectiveness of the implementation of the Strategy for Innovative Development of Russia. Theoretical analysis. Import substitution processes in Russian economy began in the late 1990s. The main reason at that time was the ruble devaluation, due to which the volume of imports in 1998–1999 decreased by more than 30%. Imports replacement became possible by increasing the supply of domestic producers who resumed the use of previously mothballed facilities. According to a number of Russian economists, during this period import substitution was one of the key drivers of GDP and industrial production growth in the country. In the 2000s, import substitution processes began to take on a point-by-point rather than a mass factor: they took place in those industries where Russian enterprises had clear competitive advantages. In 2014, following the implementation of economic sanctions against Russia, the Government adopted a number of measures aimed at intensifying import substitution in the country. Empirical analysis. The text of the strategy identifies import substitution as one of the key factors in the innovative development of the domestic economy. The paper considers the impact of the ongoing policy of import substitution on the achievement of the strategic goals of Russia’s innovative development. A statistical analysis of indicators characterizing the effectiveness of ongoing measures in the field of import substitution and stimulation of innovative development was carried out. Results. According to the results of data statistical analysis, a conclusion is obtained that the target indicators in the field of import substitution have not been achieved: in key sectors of the economy there is still a high dependence on supplies of foreign products. Innovative technologies used by domestic organizations are still mainly of import origin. At the same time, indicators of innovation activity in Russia remain significantly lower than in foreign countries. This situation relates mainly to such factors as lack or shortage of organizations funds, long payback period of investments in innovation, lack of qualified personnel, as well as reduction of opportunities in cooperation with other enterprises and scientific organizations. |
Izv. Sarat. Univ. Economics. Management. Law, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 4 |
Macro Trends and Threshold Changes of Modern Russian Economy |
Methodological and theoretical aspects of threshold changes of macroeconomical dynamics in modern Russia are considered in the article. |
Izv. Sarat. Univ. Economics. Management. Law, 2012, vol. 12, iss. 1 |
Specifics of the Russian Model of the State Entrepreneurship |
In different historical periods and in different countries the model of the state entrepreneurship has special, unique features, its own forms and methods of influence on the macroeconomic dynamics and socio-economic development. The study of the specific Russian model of the state entrepreneurship is necessary to implement a successful economic policy of the government in our country. Theoretical analysis. In macroeconomic models the system of the national economy is determined by three key aggregate economic entities (sectors of the economy): households, businesses and government. The activity of the state, involving the use of public property and its sources of replenishment, aimed at increasing the circulation of controlled economic resources, has business orientation. A model of state entrepreneurship is determined by the national specificity of the country: historical conditions of development, a set of organizational forms, legal, cultural, religious norms, ideological, cultural traditions, and geographic location. Conclusion. The interrelation of economic and administrative activity of the state, hierarchical and financial supremacy of the state apparatus in the system of economic relations, the crucial importance of the budget in the economic life of the country is confirmed by the analysis of the historical experience of Russia. |
Izv. Sarat. Univ. Economics. Management. Law, 2013, vol. 13, iss. 3(1) |
Theoretical and Methodological Modelling Based on the Major Cycles Concept of by N. D. Kondratyev: Problem Statement |
Interest in major cycles concept by N. D. Kondratyev has been lately linked with its applied usage for analysis and evaluation of the perspectives of economy’s crisis state of leading countries and world economy. Development of fundamental economic theory and formation of renewed educational courses by means of theoretical and methodological modeling can be carried out within the framework of major cycles paradigm by N. D. Kondratyev. Research methods. The article presents the theoretical and methodological modeling potential based on the major cycles concept. The study uncovers the interconnection between model factors: technological, social and demographic, ecological, capital accumulation, dynamics of the monetary conversion sphere, outlet market development, correlation of forces between different countries on the world market, actions of social groups inside separate states. Results. Major cycles define the dynamics of development of the society’s economic development, which can be viewed as a special economic paradigm, which is a system of economic knowledge and practical skills, behavior samples, stimuli and regulators of reproduction, organizational forms, legal, cultural, religious norms, and ideological settings. There is a close interconnection between dynamics of country economy’s conjuncture and state enterprise. The article shows the possibility of theoretical and methodological modelling of spatio-temporal design and economy’s long wave oscillations within the framework of the world system analysis. Conclusion. Interchange of periods of long-term falls and rises in the Russian economy coincided with the change of state enterprise practice. Repetition of events shows the consistency of transition from one economic paradigm to another under conditions of revolutionary breakage of all social norms. |
Izv. Sarat. Univ. Economics. Management. Law, 2013, vol. 13, iss. 3(1) |