Cite this article as:

Komkova G. N., Tumeneva N. V. The institution of electronic appeals and its role in improving information and communication culture. Izv. Saratov Univ., Economics. Management. Law, 2021, vol. 21, iss. 4, pp. 410-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2021-21-4-410-418


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
UDC: 
338.1+736
Language: 
Russian

The institution of electronic appeals and its role in improving information and communication culture

Introduction. Currently, most of the public services are provided in a digital format, which triggers the activization of the “feedback” channel between authorities and organizations performing public functions and consumers of services. Functionally, this task can be solved with the help of the institution of electronic appeals. Theoretical analysis. It is noted that qualitative changes in the social setting in connection with the digitalization of the economy have led to a change in the relationship between the state and the individual. The management paradigm is built in accordance with the interests of the subject, i.e. the consumer of public services for the population, most of which are provided to the subject in the electronic form with their subsequent evaluation through the institution of electronic appeals. Empirical analysis. The authors analyze the legislation regulating the procedure for consideration of citizens’ appeals, including written ones, submitted electronically. The authors formulate the definition of the concept of “electronic appeals” and carry out the classification of electronic appeals. The researchers also characterize the legal regimes of filing and consideration of electronic appeals through the official websites of public bodies and organizations performing public functions, as well as through federal official (state) websites specially designed for citizens to submit appeals in the form of an electronic document. Results. In conclusion, the authors highlight the important role of the institution of electronic appeals in digital transformation and the increasing level of information and communication culture.

References: 
  1. Kabashov S.Yu. Changes in the philosophy of state and municipal service: From a “strong state” to a “service state”. Ekonomika i upravlenie: nauchno-prakticheskij zhurnal [Economics and Management: A Scientifi c and Practical Journal], 2016, no. 5 (133), pp. 69–75 (in Russian).
  2. Zajkovskij V. N. “Service state”: A new paradigm or modern technology of public administration. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ [National Interests: Priorities and Security], 2014, vol. 10, no. 24 (261), pp. 18–28 (in Russian).
  3. Kozhenko Ya. V., Mamychev A. Yu. Service state: Problems of theory and practice of implementation. Vlast’ [Power], 2010, no. 3, pp. 44–46 (in Russian).
  4. Bachilo I. L. Is the state social or service? Information and legal aspect. In: E. V. Alferova, ed. Sovremennoe gosudarstvo: politiko-pravovye i ekonomicheskie issledovaniya [Modern State: Political, Legal and Economic Research]. Moscow, Institut nauchnoi informatsii po obshchestvennym naukam RAN, 2010, pp. 182–191 (in Russian).
  5. Duraev T. A. Transformation of the political system in conditions of multiparty system. Vybory v konstitutsionnoi sisteme vlasti [Elections in the Constitutional System of Power. Materials of the IX International Constitutional Forum]. Saratov, Saratovskiy istochnik Publ., 2018, pp. 53–55 (in Russian).
  6. Abaeva E. A., Bajniyazova Z. S., Basova A. V.,Vasilevich G. A., Velieva D., Gabdualiev M. T., Golub O. Yu., Kazakov А. А., Komkova G. N., Kulikova S. A. Povyshenie urovnya informatsionno-kommunikativnoi kul’ tury grazhdan pravovymi sredstvami i mekhanizmami [Raising the Level of Information and Communication Culture of Citizens by Legal Means and Mechanisms]. Moscow, Rusajns Publ., 2021. 295 p. (in Russian).
  7. Kholodnaya E. V. On the digital transformation of public administration in Denmark. Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin, 2020, no. 4 (135), pp. 230–235 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/2227-7315-2020-10121
  8. Kulikova S. A. Legislative consolidation of the right of citizens to access information in the acts of the subjects of the Russian Federation. Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie [State Power and Local Self-government], 2010, no. 11, pp. 27–30 (in Russian).
  9. Information and statistical review of the appeals of citizens, organizations and public associations addressed to the President of the Russian Federation in 2020, as well as the results of consideration and measures taken by the State power and local self-government. Available at:http://www.letters.kremlin.ru/digests/248 (accessed 20 September 2021) (in Russian).
  10. Passport of the draft Federal Law No. 1025833-7 “On Amendments to Individual Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation (regarding the introduction of benefits for paying for Internet access for certain Categories of citizens) of 05.06.2020. ATR “Consultant” [electronic resource] (in Russian).
  11. On the procedure for considering the appeal of citizens of the Russian Federation. Federal Law of 02.05.2006 (an edition of 27.12.2018). Rossiyskaya gazeta [Russian Newspaper], 2006, May 5; 2018, December 29 (in Russian).
  12. On amendments to the Federal Law “On the Procedure for Considering Appeals from Citizens of the Russian Federation”. Draft Federal Law of 10.05,2017. Available at: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/169842-7  (accessed 20 September 2021) (in Russian).
  13. On amendments to Articles 10 and 12 of the Federal Law “On the Procedure for Considering Appeals from Citizens of the Russian Federation”. Draft Federal Law of 01.03.2019. Available at: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/657188-7 (accessed 20 September 2021) (in Russian).
  14. On amendments to Articles 7 and 11 of the Federal Law “On the Procedure for Considering Appeals from Citizens of the Russian Federation”. Draft Federal Law of 05.10.2020. Available at: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/1030137-7 (accessed 20 September 2021) (in Russian).
  15. Toguzaeva E. N. On the correlation of the concepts of “informing”, “information support”, “information activity”. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2011, vol. 11, iss. 2, pp. 112–113 (in Russian).
  16. Savos’kin A.V. Specialized official websites on the Internet for fi ling citizens’ appeals. Administrativnoe i municipal’noe pravo [Administrative and Municipal Law], 2017, no. 2, pp. 85–96 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.7256/1999-2807.2017.2.21503
  17. Kolichestvo grazhdan, kotorye vospol’zovalis’ servisami edinogo portala Gosuslug v 2020 godu, sostavilo 56 mln chelovek (The number of citizens who used the services of the unifi ed portal of Public services in 2020 amounted to 56 million people). Available at: https://digital.gov.ru/ru/events/40942/ (accessed 1 September 2021) (in Russian).
  18. On conducting an experiment on the use of the federal state information system “A single portal of state and municipal services (functions)” for sending citizens and legal entities to state bodies, local governments, state and municipal institutions, other organizations performing publicly signifi cant functions, and their offi cials to persons of messages and appeals, as well as for the direction of such bodies and organizations of responses to these messages and appeals. Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation no. 1802 of 10.11.2020. ATP “Garant” [electronic resourc] (in Russian).
Full Text (PDF): 
Status: 
опубликована