Cite this article as:

Vasina A. V., Sysoeva O. V., Kiseleva O. N. On the issue of forming a university hub in the concept of open innovation. Izv. Saratov Univ., Economics. Management. Law, 2023, vol. 23, iss. 1, pp. 10-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2023-23-1-10-19


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
UDC: 
001.895+378.4
Language: 
Russian

On the issue of forming a university hub in the concept of open innovation

Introduction. A feature of Russian innovative economy development is the need to solve many problems in a limited time frame, which include the accelerated development of domestic production and the market through the introduction of innovative solutions in the context of minimizing external economic threats associated with anti-Russian sanctions from unfriendly countries. The models of innovative activity are considered and their key subjects are identified. It has been revealed that one of the effective mechanisms for achieving the set goals is to accelerate the pace of introduction of intellectual property objects into industry through the transfer of scientific research results to production. Theoretical analysis. The article discusses the place and role of universities in strengthening the innovative potential in the field of intellectual property. The analysis of existing state measures aimed at stimulating the development of innovative potential of universities was carried out. Such mechanisms of interuniversity interaction as the concept of open innovations and network university are considered. Еmpirical analysis. The indicators characterizing the patent activity of the subjects of innovation activity are determined, and the analysis of the dynamics of such indicators as the number of applications and granted patents, self-sufficiency and technological dependence on foreign sources is carried out. It is concluded that at present these indicators are characterized by recession. The results obtained require the adoption of new decisions and the activation of university science as the main subject of the “growth point” of innovative ideas and solutions. Results. The result of the study is a proposal to form a university hub based on a platform for intensifying patent activity not only in the context of university innovation, but also to attract various economic actors involved in the process of both import substitution and strengthening the country’s industrial sovereignty. An analysis was made of the ways of commercialization of intellectual property objects and the planned benefits for subjects-consumers of the university hub services. The advantages of creating a university hub are highlighted, contributing to the development of the innovation sphere and strengthening inter-university relations.

References: 
  1. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix – University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 1995, vol. 14, pp. 14–19.
  2. Ickovic G. Troinaya spiral’. Universitety – predpriyatiya – gosudarstvo. Innovatsii v deistvii [Universities – Enterprises – The State. Innovations in Action]. Tomsk, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics Publ., 2010. 238 p. (in Russian).
  3. Carayannis E., Campbell D. “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 2009, vol. 46, pp. 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
  4. Kiseleva O. N. Development of the ecosystem approach in the context of increasing the innovative activity of Russian enterprises. Economy, Governance and Law Basis., 2022, no. 1 (32), pp. 12–16 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.51608/23058641_2022_1_12
  5. Poltorykhina S. University as a Key Element of the Core of an Innovative Ecosystem. Newsletter of North-Caucasus Federal University, 2021, no. 2 (83), pp. 107–110 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-907X.2021.2.14
  6. Carayannis E. G., Barth T. D., Campbell D. F. The Quintuple Helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2012, vol. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2
  7. Carayannis E. G., Campbell D. F. J. Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: A proposed framework for a transdisciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 2010, vol. 1, iss. 1, pp. 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
  8. Carayannis E. G., Campbell D. F. J. Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge Production System. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2011, vol. 2, pp. 327–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0058-3
  9. Sysoeva O. V. Development of academic entrepreneurship in the system of innovation models. Journal of New Economy, 2019, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 83–100 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2019-20-3-6
  10. Shpak A. S., Ryzhaya A. A., Belyakov S. A. University science in scientifi c and technological development: evolution of state policy, domestic experience and international practice. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law, 2021, no. 12, pt. 1, pp. 200–212 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17513/vaael.1985
  11. Ivashchenko N. Formation and development of new research trends in conditions of transformation of universities. Scientifi c Research of the Faculty of Economics. Electronic Magazine, 2016, vol. 8, iss. 2, pp. 24–42 (in Russian).
  12. Glavnyi informatsionno-vychislitel’nyi tsentr (The main information and computing center). Available at: https://monitoring.miccedu.ru/ (accessed 9 December 2022) (in Russian).
  13. Global Innovation Index. Available at: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org (accessed 9 December 2022).
  14. On measures of state support for leading universities of the Russian Federation in order to increase their competitiveness among the world’s leading scientifi c and educational centers. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 16.03.2013 no. 211 (an edition of 30.12.2020). Available at: https://www.5top100.ru/documents/regulations/673/ (accessed 9 December 2022) (in Russian).
  15. On the implementation of a pilot project to create national research universities. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 7.10.2008 no. 1448. ATP «Garant» [electronic resource] (in Russian).
  16. Representatives of Russia’s leading universities have outlined a plan of joint actions in the face of sanctions. National Research University Higher School of Economics. Available at: https://www.hse.ru/news/edu/627432900.html (accessed 9 December 2022) (in Russian).
  17. 10 educational organizations will start teaching students on network programs. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation. Available at: https://minobrnauki.gov.ru/press-center/news/novostiministerstva/39229/ (accessed 9 December 2022) (in Russian).
  18. Chesbrough H. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press, 2003. 228 р.
  19. Yun J. J., Won D., Park K. Entrepreneurial cyclical dynamics of open innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2018, vol. 28, pp. 1151–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0596-y
  20. Laursen K., Salter A. The Paradox of Openness: Appropriability, External Search and Collaboration. Research Policy, 2014, vol. 43, pp. 867–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004
  21. Kiseleva O. N., Sysoeva O. V., Vasina A. V., Sysoev V. V. Updating the Open Innovation Concept Based on Ecosystem Approach: Regional Aspects. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2022, vol. 8, iss. 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020103
  22. Federal’nyi institut promyshlennoi sobstvennosti (Federal Institute of Industrial Property). Available at: https://new.fi ps.ru/to-applicants/inventions/ (accessed 9 December 2022) (in Russian).
  23. Rating “Index of inventive activity of Russian universities” – 2022. EKSPERT Analiticheskiy tsentr (EXPERT Analytical Center). Available at: https://expert-ural.com/analytics/ratings/reyting-indeks-izobretatelskoyaktivnosti-rossiyskih-universitetov--2022.html (accessed 9 December 2022) (in Russian).
  24. Indikatory nauki: 2022 [Science and Technology Indicators in the Russian Federation: 2022]. Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 2022. 400 p. Available at: https://img-cdn.tinkoffjournal.ru/-/indikatori-nauki-2022.fwbkhp.pdf  (accessed 9 December 2022) (in Russian).
  25. Another university in Russia has received Rospatent accreditation for preliminary assessment of patentability of inventions. Rospatent. Available at: https://rospatent.gov.ru/ru/news/ufu-akkreditovan-rospatentom (accessed 9 December 2022) (in Russian).
Full Text (PDF): 
Status: 
одобрена к публикации