Русский
EnglishCite this article as:
Дерунова Е. А., Семенов А. С. Appoaches to the Development of Commodity Sector Russia . Izv. Saratov Univ., Economics. Management. Law, 2014, vol. 14, iss. 2, pp. 379-386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2014-14-2-2-379-386
Appoaches to the Development of Commodity Sector Russia
Introduction. Problematic issues of economic growth based on the development of the commodity sector are relevant for Russia due to the fact that the added value of primary industry generates significant share of gross domestic product. Economic development of the country at all levels of government depends on the competitive advantages of the industrial complex and primarily raw materials sector. Theoretical analysis. The article presents the methodological aspects of the theory of imitation and innovation in the framework of endogenous growth theory to study the dynamics of innovation development in developing and transition economies. In the framework of the theory is justified, for Russia optimal point of economic growth are high-tech sector, who is at the stage of innovation development. Studied the interdependence of innovation and competition. Justified by the impact of state orders for the development of innovation in Russia. Discussion of results. A scheme for the implementation of government programs to improve the system of public procurement through subsidies and concessional lending resources sector. Proposed direct and indirect methods of management innovation resources sector. The basic directions of development of innovation in the form of the commodity sector of the state order. Typology of regions held by the criterion of subsidies. Methodical approaches to mathematical modeling of economic growth and stability in the region on the basis of the research potential of the region and the number of region-of subjects and objects. Justified determinants of positive and negative effects of economic growth and the need for restructuring of industrial sectors on the basis of intellectual, technological and geographical competitive advantage.
1. Kazybaev A. K. Upravlenie malym innovatsionnym biznesom [Management of small innovative busines- ses]. Problemy agrorynka [Problems of the agricultural market], 2004, no. 3, pp. 42–46.
2. Morck R., Stangeland D., Yeung B. Inherited wealth, corporate control, and economic growth: the Cana- dian disease. Concentrated Corporate Ownership. Ed. R. Morck. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, IL, 2000, pp. 319–369.
3. Ross M. Docs Oil hinder democracy? World Politics, 2001, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 325–361.
4. Carlin W., Seabright P. The Importance of Competition in Developing Countries for Productivity and Innova- tion. Background paper for World Development Report, 2004, pp. 89–94.
5. Tishchenko I. V. Teoreticheskie osnovy vliianiia syr’e- voi zavisimosti gosudarstva na sostoianie ego poli- ticheskikh institutov [Theoretical bases of influence of the state of commodity dependence on the state of its political institutions]. Vestnik MGOU [Bulletin MSRU], Ser. History and Political Science, 2013, no. 1, pp. 80–84.
6. Polterovich V., Tonis A. Innovation and Imitation at Various Stages o Development: A Model with Capi- tal. Working Paper, Moscow, New Economic School, 2005. 26 p.
7. Derunova E., Semenov A. Study of the Problematic Issues of the Raw Material Orientation of the Econo- my : The Dutch Disease and its Influence on Innovative Development. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2013, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1295–1301.
8. Derunova E. A. Metodicheskie podkhody k otsenke effektivnosti nauchno-tekhnicheskikh proektov v sisteme prodvizheniia nauchnykh dostizhenii v sel’skom khoziaistve [Methodological approaches to assessing the effectiveness of scientific-technical projects in the promotion of scientific advances in agriculture]. Vestnik OrelGAU, 2012, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 123–126.
9. Firsova A. A. Napravleniia razvitiia investirovaniia innovatsionnoi deiatel’nosti v proektakh gosudarst- venno-chastnogo partnerstva [Directions of develop- ment of innovation investment in public-private part-nership]. Izv. Saratov Univ. New Ser. Ser. Economics. Management. Law. 2012. Vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 67–71.
10. Feigin V. I., Braginskii O. B., Zabolotskii S. A., Kukushkin I. G., Maevskii A. V., Maslennikov N. I., Rykov Iu. G. Issledovanie sostoianiia i perspektiv napravlenii pererabotki nefti i gaza, nefte- i gazokhimii v RF [Study on the status and prospects of areas of oil and gas, petrochemicals and gas in the Russian Federa- tion]. Moscow, Economy Inf., 2011. 806 p.
11. Sachs J., Warner A. Natural resource Abundance and Economic growth Nber, 1997. Available at: http://www. cid.harvard.edu/ciddata/warner_ iles/natresf5.pdf (ac- cessed 28 March 2014).
12. Sonin K., Guriev S. Ekonomika «Resursnogo prokli- atiia» [Economy of the resource curse]. Voprosy eko- nomiki, 2010, no. 3, pp. 4–22.
13. Alexeev M., Conrad R. He Elusive Curse of Oil. San Working Paper, 2005, no. 7, pp. 12–32.
14. Iskakova S. G. Rynok sel’skokhoziaistvennoi tekhniki i VTO [Farm Machinery Market and the WTO]. Tekhnika i oborudovanie dlia sela [Machinery and equipment for the village], 2005, no. 3, pp. 12–15.
15. Derunova E. A. Rynochno-gosudarstvennaia model’ upravleniia innovatsionnym razvitiem APK [Market- state model of innovative development Agribusiness]. Innovatsionnyi Vestnik Region [Innovation Gazette Region], 2012, no. 3, pp. 58–63.
16. Vinokurov S. S. Subsidirovanie kak faktor rosta eko- nomiki regiona [Subsidization as a factor of economic growth in the region]. Izv. Ros. Gos. Ped. Univ. im. A. I. Gertsena [Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities and Sciences], 2008, no. 69, pp. 52–58.
