Cite this article as:

Ryzhenkov A. J. On the doctrinal principles of family law (The case study of the principle of responsibility for violation of family law norms). Izv. Saratov Univ., Economics. Management. Law, 2021, vol. 21, iss. 2, pp. 169-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2021-21-2-169-177

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
Law
UDC: 
347.6
Language: 
Russian

On the doctrinal principles of family law (The case study of the principle of responsibility for violation of family law norms)

Introduction. The article proposes supplementing the system of principles of family law with a new doctrinal principle – the principle of responsibility for violations of family law. Theoretical analysis. The article explores scientific ideas about the system of principles of family law, the features of family legal responsibility, the relationship of protection measures and liability measures in family law. Result. The article concludes that only the sanctions of the moral nature should be attributed to the family-legal sanctions. Property sanctions (compensation for non-pecuniary damage, disinheritance, recovery of losses) are of a civil nature, although they reflect the specifics of family relations. In addition to specific sanctions, the essence of family law liability lies in the special composition of the subjects of these sanctions, as well as the special procedures under which they are subject to application.

Author: 
Ryzhenkov
Anatoly
J.
Company: 
Kalmyk State University named after B. B. Gorodovikova
11, Pushkin Street, Elista, Republic of Kalmykia, Russia 358000, Russia
E-mail: 
4077778@list.ru
Key words: 
principle
responsibility
family
deprivation
restriction
parental rights
doctrine
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2021-21-2-169-177
References: 
  1. Family Code of the Russian Federation 223-FZ of 29.12.1995 (an edition of 04.02.2021). ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource] (in Russian).
  2. Agafonov A. V. Doktrinal’nye osnovy konstitutsionnogo pravosudija v sub#ektakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Doctrinal foundations of constitutional justice in the subjects of the Russian Federation]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Saratov, 2007. 22 p. (in Russian).
  3. Demichev A. A. Positivist classification of principles of civil procedural law. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskiy protsess [Arbitration and Civil Process], 2005, no. 7, pp. 5–10 (in Russian).
  4. Baratashvili D. T. Printsipy ofitsial’nogo iuridicheskogo tolkovaniya [Principles of official legal interpretation]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Nizhny Novgorod, 2005. 31 p. (in Russian).
  5. Danilyan M. A. Alimentnye obiazatel’stva roditelei po soderzhaniyu nesovershennoletnikh detei i otvetstvennost’ za ikh narushenie [Alimony obligations of parents for the maintenance of minor children and responsibility for their violation]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2015. 28 p. (in Russian).
  6. Ksenofontova D. S. Pravovye garantii v sfere alimentirovaniya [Legal guarantees in the sphere of alimony]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Kazan, 2015. 229 p. (in Russian).
  7. Kuznetsova O.V. Principles of family law. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Series Law, 2003, no. 2, pp. 71–76 (in Russian).
  8. Turusova O. S. Legal nature and distinctive features of family-legal responsibility. Juridicheskaia nauka [Jurisprudence], 2011, no. 1, pp. 34–37 (in Russian).
  9. Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Violations 195-FZ of 30.12.2001. ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource] (in Russian).
  10. Chicherova L. E. Otvetstvennost’ v semeinom prave: voprosy teorii i praktiki [Responsibility in family law: Issues of theory and practice]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Krasnodar, 2004. 28 p. (in Russian).
  11. Convention on the rights of the child (adopted by the General Assembly of the UN 20.11.1989, entered into force for the USSR 15.09.1990. ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource] (in Russian).
  12. The Constitution of the Russian Federation (adopted by the popular vote of 12.12.1993) (amended by Federal Constitutional Law 6-FKZ of 30.12.2008, Federal Constitutional Law 7-FKZ of 30.12.2008, Federal Constitutional Law 2-FKZ of 05.02.2014, Federal Constitutional Law 11-FKZ of 21.07.2014, Federal Constitutional Law 1-FKZ of 14.03.2020). Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2014, no. 31, art. 4398; 2020, no. 11, art. 1416 (in Russian).
  13. Suntsova E. A. Netraditsionnye vidy juridicheskoi otvetstvennosti [Non-Traditional types of legal liability]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2005. 22 p. (in Russian).
  14. Lipinsky D. A. On the system of law and types of legal responsibility. Pravovedenie [Jurisprudence], 2003, no. 2, pp. 27–37 (in Russian).
  15. Kislukhin V. A. Vidy juridicheskoi otvetstvennosti [Types of legal liability]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2002. 28 p. (in Russian).
  16. Savelyev Yu. M. Interrelation of responsibility in family law with other types of legal responsibility. Vektor nauki Tol’yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskiye nauki [Vector of Science of Togliatti State University. Series: Legal Sciences], 2017, no. 2, pp. 59–62 (in Russian).
  17. Zvenigorodskaya N. F. Place of responsibility of parents under family law in the system of legal responsibility. Voprosy juvenal’noi justitsii [Juvenile Justice Issues], 2010, no. 5, pp. 14–15 (in Russian).
  18. Minko N. S. Features of family legal responsibility. Aktual’nye problemy grazhdanskogo prava [Current Problems of Civil Law], 2017, no. 2, pp. 140–149 (in Russian).
  19. Levushkin A. N., Serebryakova A. A. Semeinoe pravo [Family Law: Textbook]. Moscow, YUNITI-DANA Publ., 2012. 407 p. (in Russian).
  20. Murugina V.V. General theoretical analysis of legal means of reacting to the defectiveness of legal facts. Law. Legislation. Person, 2010, no. 1 (8), pp. 7–15 (in Russian).
  21. Gliwinskaya I. N. The essence of responsibility in family law. Semeinoe i zhilischnoe pravo [Family and Housing Law], 2008, no. 3, pp. 5–7 (in Russian).
  22. Kosenko E. V. Principle of responsibility of subjects and participants of family legal relations. Nauka i obrazovanie: hoziaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel’stvo; pravo i upravlenie [Science and Education: Agriculture and Economy; Entrepreneurship; Law and Management], 2017, no. 1, pp. 106–109 (in Russian).
  23. Samoschenko I. S., Farukshin M. X. Otvetstvennost’ po sovetskomu zakonodatel’stvu [Liability under Soviet Legislation]. Moscow, Yuridicheskaia literatura Publ., 1971. 240 p. (in Russian).
  24. Ryazanov E. E. Problemy juridicheskoi otvetstvennosti v chastnom prave [Problems of legal liability in private law]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2005. 32 p. (in Russian).
  25. Danilova I. S. Institut priemnoi sem’i v sisteme form ustroistva detij, ostavshikhsia bez popecheniya roditelei v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Institute of foster families in the system of forms of placement of children left without parental care in the Russian Federation]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2015. 238 p. (in Russian).
  26. Sakhaeva A. M. On measures of family-legal responsibility of the parents according to the family legislation of the Russian Federation. Izvestiya vuzov. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Obschestvennye nauki [University News. North Caucasus Region. Social Science Series], 2014, no. 2, pp, 77–79 (in Russian).
  27. Karibyan S. O. Semejno-pravovaia otvetstvennost’: suchhnost’ i pravoprimenenie po zakonodatel’stvu Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Family and legal responsibility: the essence and law enforcement under the legislation of the Russian Federation]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2017. 29 p. (in Russian).
  28. Ordinartsev I. I. Ogranichenie roditel’skikh prav kak institut semeinogo prava Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Restriction of parental rights as an institution of family law of the Russian Federation]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2012. 24 p. (in Russian).
  29. Imomova N. M. Lishenie roditel’skikh prav kak mera otvetstvennosti v semeinom prave Respubliki Tadzhikistan [Deprivation of parental rights as a measure of responsibility in family law of the Republic of Tajikistan]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Dushanbe, 2015. 171 p. (in Tajik).
  30. Federal’naia sluzhba gorudarstvennoi statistiki (Federal State Statistics Service. Site). Available at: https://gks.ru/search?q=%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5+%D1%8... (accessed 31 July 2020).
  31. Staroselzeva M. M. Osuschestvlenie i zaschita roditel’skikh prav po semeinomu zakonodatel’stvu Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Implementation and protection of parental rights in the family legislation of the Russian Federation]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2009. 180 p. (in Russian).
  32. Sadeeva G. M. Usynovlenie kak forma ustroistva detei, ostavshikhsia bez popecheniya roditelei: teoriya i praktika primeneniya [Adoption as a form of arrangement of children left without parental care: Theory and practice of application]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Kazan, 2015. 207 p. (in Russian).
  33. Sidorova S. A. Voprosy primeneniya mer grazhdanskopravovoi i semeino-pravovoi otvetstvennosti v semeinom prave [Questions of application of civil and family liability measures in family law]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Volgograd, 2007. 24 p. (in Russian).
  34. Turusova O. S. Semeino-pravovaia otvetstvennost’ v Rossiiskoi Federatsii i zarubezhnykh gosudarstvakh [Family-legal responsibility in the Russian Federation and foreign states]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2011. 30 p. (in Russian).
Full Text (PDF): 
PDF icon ekonomika_2021_2_169-177.pdf
Status: 
опубликована
Journal issue: 
Izv. Sarat. Univ. Economics. Management. Law, 2021, vol. 21, iss. 2