Cite this article as:

Lipchanskaya M. A., Privalov S. A. Prospects and problems of using machine-readable law in legal proceedings. Izv. Saratov Univ., Economics. Management. Law, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 4, pp. 424-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2022-22-4-424-431

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
Law
UDC: 
342.722
Language: 
Russian

Prospects and problems of using machine-readable law in legal proceedings

Introduction. The article is devoted to the study of the potential application of machine-readable law technologies in the field of judicial protection of human rights. In the course of the research, the authors analyzed the Concept of development of machine-readable law technologies, approved by the Governmental Commission on Digital Development and the Use of Information Technologies for Improving the Quality of Life and the Business Environment. It was established that the achievement of one of the key directions of application of machine-readable law, according to the Concept, i.e. modernization of judicial proceedings in Russia, will objectively entail the improvement of the procedure of judicial protection of human rights. Theoretical analysis. The current state of legal proceedings in the Russian Federation is characterized by a set of problems that negatively affect the efficiency of the judicial protection of human and civil rights and freedoms in Russia. The concept of development of machinereadable law technologies offers a number of directions for the improvement of law enforcement in the framework of judicial proceedings in the Russian Federation with the use of machine-readable law technologies, which, hypothetically, will lead to the improvement of the mechanism of judicial protection of human rights. In turn, scientific community also puts forward additional directions of application of machine-readable law in the field of legal proceedings. Empirical analysis. The “advantages” of application of machine-readable law in court proceedings, highlighted by the Concept of development of machine-readable law technologies, can be recognized as effective in the tactical perspective. In addition, the development and application of the concept of machine-readable law in the field of judicial protection of human rights can be associated with the development and use of artificial intelligence technologies. Results. According to the results of the study of the Concept of development of machine-readable law technologies, as well as the ideas of legal scholars, the authors reached conclusions about the usefulness of the chosen approach to the definition of the concept of machine-readable law in the document. Notwithstanding some theoretical flaws in formulation of the machine-readable law and its ontology in the studied Conception, certain directions of development and implementation of the machinereadable law in the sphere of legal proceedings have tactical character, seem to be useful and effective for improvement of judicial protection of human rights. At the same time, this approach to the definition of machine-readable law and guidelines for its development can be used in the future to improve the concept in order to solve strategic problems of judicial enforcement.

Author: 
Lipchanskaya
M.
A.
Company: 
Saratov State Law Academy
1, Volskaya str., Saratov, 410056, Russia
E-mail: 
lipchan_maria@mail.ru
Privalov
Sergej
A.
Company: 
Saratov State Law Academy
1, Volskaya str., Saratov, 410056, Russia
E-mail: 
priwalow18@gmail.com
Key words: 
machine-readable law
right to judicial protection
judicial protection of rights
judicial proceedings
artificial intelligence
Concept of development of machine-readable law technologies
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2022-22-4-424-431
References: 
  1. 1. The Constitution of the Russian Federation (adopted by the popular vote of 12.12.1993) (amended by Federal Constitutional Law 6-FKZ of 30.12.2008, Federal Constitutional Law 7-FKZ of 30.12.2008, Federal Constitutional Law 2-FKZ of 05.02.2014, Federal Constitutional Law 11-FKZ of 21.07.2014, Federal Constitutional Law 1-FKZ of 14.03.2020). Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2014, no. 31, art. 4398; 2020, no. 11, art. 1416 (in Russian).
  2. Kovaleva N. N. The main directions of digitalization of law. In: V. S. Slobozhnikova, I. V. Suslov (eds.) Rossiiskaya obshchestvenno-gumanitarnaya nauka pered vyzovami sovremennosti [Russian social and humanitarian science facing the challenges of modernity. A collection of articles based on the materials of the Int. sci. and pract. conf.]. Saratov, Saratov State Law Academy Publ., 2019, pp. 143–151 (in Russian).
  3. Lipchanskaya M. A. (ed.) Realizatsiya konstitutsionnykh sotsial’nykh prav i svobod s ispol’zovaniem iskusstvennogo intellekta: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya, predely i otvetstvennost’ [Implementation of Constitutional Social Rights and Freedoms Using Artifi cial Intelligence: Problems of Legal Regulation, Limits and Responsibility]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2022. 208 p. (in Russian).
  4. Novikova K. S. The use of artifi cial intelligence in the preparation of judicial decisions. Speech at the international conference “Digitalization of Law: Prerequisites, Challenges, Solutions”. Universitet Pravitel’stva Moskvy (University of the Government of Moscow. Site). Available at: https://mguu.ru/tsifrovizatsiya-prava-predposylki-printsipy-resheniya-2/ (accessed 19 January 2022) (in Russian).
  5. Bezborodov A. Yu. The use of information technologies in the preparation of judicial decisions. Speech at the international conference “Digitalization of Law: Prerequisites, Challenges, Solutions”. Universitet Pravitel’stva Moskvy (University of the Government of Moscow. Site). Available at: https://mguu.ru/tsifrovizatsiya-pravapredposylki-printsipy-resheniya-2/ (accessed 19 January 2022) (in Russian).
  6. Machine-readable law: is its application possible in the near future? ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource] (in Russian).
  7. Concept of development of machine-readable law technologies. Ministerstvo ekonomicheskogo razvitiya RF (Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation. Site). Available at: https://www.economy.gov.ru/material/news/v_pravitelstve_utverdili_koncepciyu_razvitiya_tehnologiy_mashinochitaemogo_prava.html (accessed 19 January 2022) (in Russian).
  8. Ponkin I. V. The concept of machine-readable law. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika [Legal Technique], 2021, no. 15, pp. 231–236 (in Russian).
  9. Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation 96-FZ of 24.07.2002. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2002, no. 30, art. 3012 (in Russian).
  10. Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation 138-FZ of 14.11.2002. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2002. no. 46, art. 4532 (in Russian).
  11. Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation 174-FZ of 18.12.2001. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2001, no. 52, art. 4921 (in Russian).
  12. Code of Administrative Court Procedure of the Russian Federation 21-FZ of 08.03.2015. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2015, no. 10, art. 1391 (in Russian).
  13. Beljakova A. V. Problems of Protection of the Right to Trial within a Reasonable Time in Civil and Arbitration Proceedings in the Russian Federation. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2018. 23 p. (in Russian).
  14. Morkhat P. M. The Use of Artifi cial Intelligence in the Judicial Proceedings. Herald of Civil Procedure, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 61–85 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2019-9-3-61-85
  15. Report on the work of the courts of general jurisdiction to review criminal cases at fi rst instance for 12 months of 2021. Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Available at: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79&item=6120 (accessed 9 May 2022) (in Russian).
  16. Report on the work of courts of general jurisdiction in the consideration of civil, administrative cases at fi rst instance for 12 months of 2021. Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Available at: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79&item=6120 (accessed 9 May 2022) (in Russian).
  17. Report on the work of courts of general jurisdiction to consider cases of administrative offenses for the 12 months of 2021. Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Available at: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79&item=6120 (accessed 9 May 2022) (in Russian).
  18. Ponkin I. V., Lapteva A. I. Pravo i tsifra: Mashinochitaemoe pravo, tsifrovye modeli-dvoiniki, tsifrovaya formalizatsiya i tsifrovaya onto-inzheneriya v prave [Law and Digital: Machine-Readable Law, Digital Twin Models, Digital Formalization and Digital Onto-Engineering in Law]. Moscow, Buki Vedi Publ., 2021. 174 p. (in Russian).
  19. Sazonova M. Machine-readable law: is it possible to apply it in the near future? ATP «Garant» [electronic resource] (in Russian).
  20. Vashkevich A. M. Avtomatizatsiya prava: pravo kak elektrichestvo [Automation of Law: Law as Electricity]. Moscow, Simploer Publ., 2018. 256 p. (in Russian).
  21. Rodionova O. M. Law and digital technology. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi juridicheskoi akademii [Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin], 2019, no. 6 (131), pp. 85–89 (in Russian).
Full Text (PDF): 
PDF icon ekonomika_2022_4-424-431.pdf
Status: 
одобрена к публикации
Journal issue: 
Izv. Sarat. Univ. Economics. Management. Law, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 4