процессуальная форма
Results of Abstract Interpretation of the Volume of Norms of Civil Procedural Law |
Introduction. The interpretation of legal norms is one of the main issues of legal science and practice which are quite debatable. The problem of interpreting norms in terms of their volume is very significant and is widely discussed in modern jurisprudence. The interpretation of the volume of norms acquires particular importance when it concerns civil procedural law as a system of norms that establish the procedure of hearing and solution of civil cases, administrative cases and some other ones. Theoretical analysis. An abstract interpretation of procedural norms is a relatively independent legal activity that is not absorbed by law-making and law enforcement. The results of such interpretation should not be included in the interpreted procedural norm. The legal provisions formed as a result of the procedural norms interpretation can differ from the content of the interpreted norm (restrictive and extensive interpretation). Empirical analysis. The practice of abstract interpretation of procedural norms by senior courts allows to identify complementary and excluding legal provisions which in terms of their volume and content differ from the interpreted procedural norm. Exclusive provisions are less common due to the prevailing imperative nature of civil procedure law. Results. The extensive and restrictive interpretation of the norms of civil procedural law leads to the formation of special complementary and excluding legal provisions that express the real meaning of the procedural norm with the generalization of practice of its implementation (including certain types of cases and certain legal situations). |
Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Economics. Management. Law, 2019, vol. 19, iss. 3 |
The Nature of Non Jurisdictional Process: Logiko-gnoseological Aspect |
Introduction. The modern legal sphere is characterized by the destruction of binary structure based on the balance of two systems of social and economical development. This had in impact on the increasing role and importance of the non-jurisdictional process based on rationalism and functional structuralism. Theoretical analysis. The article deals with the relations between form of action, procedure, and legal process to profoundly understand the nature of the non-jurisdictional process. As a result we come to a conclusion that legal relations are a universal form of action, the structural elements of which are process and procedure. Russian legislation is analyzed on the subject of normative base of the non-jurisdictional process. One of the conclusions made in the article is that non-jurisdictional process consists of action of bearers of rights and duties to provide their legitimate interest by the consequent change of the stages or conditions, which reflect the relations of the will and interest. The article touches upon the specific features of the non-jurisdictional process: the absence of dispute about rights; the presence of not less than two concerned parties; legal order as a form of action of non-jurisdictional process; the freedom of will to provide legitimate interest; conscious and volitional nature of the non-jurisdictional process. In the article the types and subtypes of the non-jurisdictional process are described. Conclusion. The non-jurisdictional process is a specific behavioral model of the subject to protect their legitimate interests. The object of non-jurisdictional process is interest of parties or third parties, that encumbered with obligations. The non-jurisdictional doesn’t affect with interests of third parties. |
Номер журнала 586 |