rights and freedoms

The Concept and the Content of the Constitutional Principle of Equality of Rights and Freedoms of Man and Citizen, Regardless of Attitudes towards Religion

Introduction. The article is devoted to the consideration of the essence of the constitutional principle of equality of rights and freedoms of a person and a citizen regardless of their attitude to religion. Discussion. The author of the article made an attempt to determine the legal nature of the constitutional principle of equality of rights and freedoms of man and citizen, regardless of their attitude to religion, to define. The criterion of discrimination is “attitude to religion”. The interrelation between the principle of equality of human and civil rights and freedoms is established, regardless of the attitude to religion and freedom of religion. The author justified the difference of discrimination on the basis of “attitude to religion” from other forms of discrimination. Conclusion. The definition of the principle of equality of rights and freedoms of man and citizen regardless of the attitude to religion is given. The structure, features of the principle of equality of rights and freedoms of a person and a citizen, regardless of their attitude to religion, are analyzed. The author determines the content of the principle of equality of rights and freedoms of man and citizen, regardless of their attitude to religion.

The Normative Bases of Legalization of Non Jurisdictional Process

Introduction. Globalization and regionalizations of social and economic communications caused contradictory changes in legal system of the Russian Federation. It is receive an ambiguous assessment in legal science and practice. So there is an introduction of not traditional categories for jurisprudence in legal practice, one of which is non jurisdictional process. Theoretical analysis. The formation of the concept of the normative bases of non jurisdictional process will promote detection of dependences between rules of legislation and its practice. The materialization of non jurisdictional process can be carried out in borders of realization of the right. It is possible because of indirect legal fixing in the legislation. Therefore legitimate interests of owners are limits of legalization of non jurisdictional process. Non jurisdictional forms of ensuring the rights and legitimate interests are applied in the international and state public and private law. Therefore, the object of analysis is different legal acts. Conclusion. This analysis allows to claim that the legislation of Russian Federation contains the provisions allowing and providing legalization of non jurisdictional process in legal system of the Russian Federation. It plays a role of the normative bases of introduction of non jurisdictional process legal practice. Legal rules are allow to consider the non jurisdictional process as one of components of the mechanism of ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of the person. In this sense the problem of not jurisdictional process is interdisciplinary.

Right for Respect of Private Life: International Realization and Protection Standards

Introduction. One of the major human rights and the citizen, guaranteed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and fundamental international legal acts the right for respect of private life is. Theoretical analysis. In article the content of the right for respect of private life is considered. According to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of the right and freedom of the person and the citizen admit and guaranteed according to the conventional principles and norms of international law. In this regard the author analyzes this right proceeding from sense which is given it by the international legal acts and interstate bodies (mainly the European Court of Human Rights). Results. Proceeding from the carried-out analysis the author allocates a complex of the rights, freedoms and separate competences which make essence of a constitutional law on personal privacy.