Cite this article as:

Industriev М. А. The theory of economic development: Evolution of approaches and modern paradigm. Izv. Saratov Univ., Economics. Management. Law, 2023, vol. 23, iss. 2, pp. 126-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2023-23-2-126-133


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
UDC: 
330.34
Language: 
Russian

The theory of economic development: Evolution of approaches and modern paradigm

Introduction. The relevance of scholarly justification of approaches to economic development is caused by the insufficient study of the economic development phenomenon, its nature and qualitative characteristics of the factors influencing the implementation of qualitative structural changes in the economy of the country. Theoretical analysis. The article summarizes the evolution of economic thought and historical transformation of attitudes concerning the study of economic development. Scientific approaches and studies of leading foreign and domestic scholars, which constituted the theoretical and methodological basis of the economic development theory, are consistently presented. The tendencies that served the modern theories of economic development formation are considered. Empirical analysis. Based on statistical data analysis the difference between the categories of «economic growth» and «economic development» is justified. The concept of economic complexity as a phenomenon that contributes to the qualitative transformation of the economic development factors is considered. The dynamics of the economic complexity index in the Russian Federation is analyzed. Results. The analysis of qualitative changes in the economic development factors in the modern mixed economy is conducted. The relevance of sustainable development theory and the concept of economic complexity application in the study of the economic development of states are demonstrated. The criteria of economic development in modern socio-economic conditions are formulated.

References: 
  1. Gadzhiev Yu. A. Early theories of economic growth: from mercantilism to the classical school. Sciences of Europe, 2017, vol. 2, no. 16 (16), pp. 16–23 (in Russian).
  2. Kene F. Izbrannye ekonomicheskie proizvedeniya [Selected Economic Works]. Moscow, Sotsekgiz, 1960. 350 p. (in Russian).
  3. Smith A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations]. Petrosavodsk, Petrokom, 1993. 320 p. (in Russian).
  4. Rikardo D. Nachala politicheskoy ekonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniya [On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2007, 960 p. (in Russian).
  5. Marx K., Engel’s F. Sochineniya [Essays. 2nd ed.]. Vol. 49. Moscow, Gospolitizdat, 1974. 570 p. (in Russian).
  6. Schumpeter J. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profi ts, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (1934) / Translated by Redvers Opie. Transaction Publishers, 1983. 255 p.
  7. Keynes D. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Moscow, Eksmo, 2022. 960 p. (in Russian).
  8. Kuznets S. Nobel Prize Lectures. Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Refl ections. Available at: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1971/kuznets-lecture.html (accessed January 30, 2023).
  9. Rostow W. W. Politics and the Stages of Growth. London, Cambridge University Press, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511562778
  10. Kadomtseva M. Ye. Conceptual aspects of sustainable development of economic systems: Evolution of approaches and modern paradigm. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2021, vol. 21, iss. 3, pp. 263–270 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2021-21-3-263-270
  11. Global ranking of companies by Market Cap. Available at: https://companiesmarketcap.com/ (accessed February 19, 2023).
  12. Jobs of Tomorrow: Mapping Opportunity in the New Economy. World Economic Forum, Switzerland, 2020. 28 p.
  13. Graham M., Hjorth I., Lehdonvirta V. Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer, 2017, vol. 23, iss. 2, pp. 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916687250
  14. Abeliansky A., Hilbert M. Digital technology and international trade: Is it the quantity of subscriptions or the quality of data speed that matters? Telecommunications Policy, 2017, vol. 41, iss. 1, pp. 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.11.001
  15. Keshelava A. V. Infrastructure of the Digital Economy. Ekonomicheskie strategii [Economic Strategies], 2017, no. 8, pp. 120–131 (in Russian).
  16. Chambers R. Ideas for development: Refl ecting forwards. IDS Working Paper 238. Brighton, 2004. 40 p.
  17. Grinberg R. S. Svoboda i spravedlivost’. Rossiiskie soblazny i logika vybora [Freedom and justice. Russian temptations and the logic of choice]. Moscow, Magistr, INFRA-M, 2012. 416 p. (in Russian).
  18. World Development Indicators. Available at: https://databank.worldbank.org/ (accessed February 15, 2023).
  19. Török I., Benedek J., Gomez-Zaldivar M. Quantifying Subnational Economic Complexity: Evidence from Romania. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, iss. 17, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710586
  20. Hidalgo, C. Economic complexity theory and applications. Nature Reviews Physics, 2021, no. 3, pp. 92–113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-00275-1
  21. The Atlas of Economic Complexity. Available at: https:// atlas.cid.harvard.edu/rankings (accessed February 14, 2023).
  22. Tumanyan Yu. R., Industriev M. A. Import substitution as a factor of Russian economy innovative development. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 4, pp. 396–405 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2022-22-4-396-405
Full Text (PDF): 
Status: 
одобрена к публикации