Economic

In the presented article some aspects of problem of development of economy of region are considered on the example of the Saratov area, in particular, questions of forming of investment policy, terms of bringing in of foreign investments in a region, forms of state support of foreign investors.

The article considers the development of the integration of education, science and industry in the form of direct and indirect mechanisms of technology transfer. The comparative analysis of such terms as «technology transfer», «technology commercialization», «innovation diffusion», «spillover of innovation». The article gives accent to the aspects and problems of technology transfer in the Russian economy.

Purpose. Regulatory support of the company is part of the institutional support and is a complex functional process consisting of both internal and external, as well as formal and informal characteristics that reflect the accepted parameters of the existence of firms in a particular stage of development of the country. This article discusses historical tendencies, theoretical and methodological issues of development and transformation of the normative support of domestic firms. Theoretical analysis. The basis of the theoretical analysis supports is the open nature of the domestic economy and law and their interdependent development. The following main stage and characteristics of the development of regulatory support firms in Russia are highlighted: early capitalist, Soviet, post-Soviet, «unbridled capitalism» and modern. Empirical analysis. There is historically conditioned priority of politics over economics in Russia. There is a relation of trends of the normative support functioning of domestic-owned firms with the dynamics of target political reference points and prevailing form of ownership. Conclusions. There is a contradiction of «double standards» of regulatory support firm: the simultaneous creation and elimination of the corruption. The modern trend will be determined more and more by upward dynamic of influence of the state, legal institutions, standards of ethics and morality for business development in regions and «de-offshorising» in Russia as a whole.

Introduction: In modern conditions, modernization of the Russian economy is of great importance. For this, it is necessary to perform categorical analysis of the concepts of “modernization” and “neo-industrialization” and to show their relationship. This determines the relevance of this research. Results: Modernization is characterized as a transition stage from one state of a system to another one, higher and better. It is carried out on the basis of neo-industrialization. The factors to hinder this neo-industrialization are: an inefficient structure of the economy and an unfavorable business climate. Spot and frontal modernizations are types of the modernization of the economy. Discussion: Neo-industrialization is understood as frontal modernization. It would require huge investments and should act as a basis of modernization. Elements of the technological basis get accelerated development in the neo-industrialization economy. Complex regularities of neo-industrialization as “innovative modernization” acquire dominating importance.